gr 210318|Case Digest: JANICE RESIDE Y TAN v. PEOPLE : iloilo The Court's Ruling. The Court finds that petitioner is guilty, not of estafa, but of qualified theft. The RTC and the CA rulings are both predicated on their finding that all the elements of estafa . Adult film actress Abella Danger accepts the award for Best Star Showcase during the 2017 Adult Video News Awards at The Joint inside the Hard Rock. of 3. NEXT. United States. CONTENT. Royalty-free Creative Video Editorial Archive Custom Content Creative Collections Contributor support Apply to be a contributor Stock photos Stock videos.
gr 210318,Therefore, as it now stands, a sum of money received by an employee in behalf of an employer is considered to be only in the material possession of the employee. Notably, such material .G.R. No. 210318. petitioner admitted that De Dios' allegations were true. 13 .Case Digest: JANICE RESIDE Y TAN v. PEOPLE G.R. No. 210318. petitioner admitted that De Dios' allegations were true. 13 Thereafter, the parties agreed to settle and a promissory note was signed by petitioner undertaking to pay De .The Court's Ruling. The Court finds that petitioner is guilty, not of estafa, but of qualified theft. The RTC and the CA rulings are both predicated on their finding that all the elements of estafa .Janice Reside vs People of the Philippines. written by Howard G. No. 210318 – 878 Phil. 122 – Criminal Law – Book II – Crimes Against Property – Theft vs Estafa – Material Possession vs Juridical Possession – Collector’s Liability .
G.R. No. 210318 July 28, 2020 Janice Reside y Tan vs. People of the Philippines A.M. No. RTJ-20-2584 July 28, 2020 Hortencia R. Cayabyab vs. Presiding Judge Irineo P. Pangilinan, Jr., .Hul 28, 2020 — Digest not created. You do not seem to have any annotations for this case. Creating your own digest is easy. Simply highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, .CONTACT: Supreme Court of the Philippines Library Services, Padre Faura, Ermita, Manila, Philippines 1000 (632) 8524-2706: [email protected]
People, G.R. No. 210318, July 28, 2020. [55] ARTICLE 22. Retroactive Effect of Penal Laws. — Penal laws shall have a retroactive effect in so far as they favor the person guilty of a felony, .People, G.R. No. 210318, July 28, 2020. [49] REV. PEN. CODE, Art. 308: Article 308. Who are liable for theft. - Theft is committed by any person who, with intent to gain but without violence .
DIFICATION. Accused-appellant Danica L. Medina is found guilty beyond reasonable doubt of estafa under-Article 315, paragraph l(b) of the Revised PenalcCode, as amended, and .People, G.R. No. 210318, July 28, 2020. 49 REV. PEN. CODE, Art. 308: Article 308. Who are liable for theft. - Theft is committed by any person who, with intent to gain but without violence against or intimidation of persons nor force upon things, shall take personal property of another without the latter's consent. Theft is likewise committed .Footnotes. 1 Penned by Associate Justice Socorro B. Inting, with Associate Justices Remedios A. SalazarFernando and Priscilla J. Baltazar-Padilla (now a Member of the Court), concurring; rollo, pp. 2-13.. 2 CA rollo. pp. 44-53.. 3 AN ACT INSTITUTING THE COMPREHENSIVE DANGEROUS DRUGS ACT OF 2002, REPEALING REPUBLIC ACT NO. 6425, OTHERWISE .SUPREME COURT Manila. EN BANC. G.R. No. L-23051 October 20, 1925. THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES ISLANDS, plaintiff-appellant, vs. JOSE MA. VELOSO, defendant-appellant .[ g.r. no. 230718, september 16, 2020 ] people of the philippines, plaintiff-appellee, vs. crisanto haya y delos santos, accused-appellant. r e s o l u t i o n
manila. en banc [ g.r. no. 252117. july 28, 2020 ] in the matter of the urgent petition for the release of prisoners on humanitarian grounds in the midst of the covid-19 pandemic,
SECOND DIVISION [ G.R. No. 233867. February 28, 2022 ] PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. XXX,1 ACCUSED-APPELLANT. D E C I S I O N. HERNANDO, J.: On appeal2 is the March 30, 2017 Decision3 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CR-H.C. No. 07147 that affirmed with modifications the November 5, 2014 Joint Decision4 of the .
This is to resolve the Petition for Review on Certiorari, under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court, dated November 5, 2007, of petitioner Lito Corpuz (petitioner), seeking to reverse and set aside the Decision [1] dated March 22, 2007 and Resolution [2] dated September 5, 2007 of the Court of Appeals (CA), which affirmed with modification the Decision [3] dated July 30, 2004 of the .
Ο ισχυρός 4K Quantum επεξεργαστής βελτιστοποιεί αυτόματα την εικόνα και προσφέρει μια πιο συναρπαστική εμπειρία στην 4K Smart τηλεόραση Samsung Q70T. Η αναβάθμιση 4K AI μειώνει τον θόρυβο της εικόνας, και αποκαθιστά τις χαμένες .[ G.R. No. 233089, June 29, 2020 ] PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. LUCILLE M. DAVID, ACCUSED-APPELLANT. D E C I S I O N. INTING, J.: This is an appeal1 filed by Lucille M. David (accused-appellant) from the Decision2 dated January 16, 2017 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CR-HC No. 07816 that affirmed the Joint Judgment3 dated .
FIRST DIVISION. January 13, 2016. G.R. No. 174113. PAZ CHENG y CHU, Petitioner, vs. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondent. D E C I S I O N. PERLAS-BERNABE, J.: Assailed in this petition for review on certiorari1 are the Decision2 dated March 28, 2006 and the Resolution3 dated June 26, 2006 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CR No. 24871, .
THIRD DIVISION [ G.R. No. 218969, January 18, 2021 ] FERNANDO PANTE Y RANGASA PETITIONER, VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT. DECISION. HERNANDO, J.: This Petition for Review on Certiorari1 under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court assails the February 6, 2015 Decision2 and June 9, 2015 Resolution3 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CR .CONTACT: Supreme Court of the Philippines Library Services, Padre Faura, Ermita, Manila, Philippines 1000 (632) 8524-2706: [email protected]
gr 210318क्रमांक विभागाचे नाव शीर्षक सांकेतांक क्रमांक जी.आर. दिनांक
gr 210318 Case Digest: JANICE RESIDE Y TAN v. PEOPLE क्रमांक विभागाचे नाव शीर्षक सांकेतांक क्रमांक जी.आर. दिनांकFootnotes * Designated additional member per Special Order No. 2797 dated November 5, 2020. 1 Penned by Associate Justice Louis P. Acosta and concurred in by Associate Justices Pamela Ann Abella Maxino and Dorothy P. Montejo-Gonzaga, all members of the Twentieth Division, rollo, pp. 5-17.. 2 Sometimes referred to as "Espina".. 3 Rollo, pp. 5-6.. 4 CA rollo, p.Resolution 2 complainant in the aforementioned amount of P335,000.00. CONTRARY TO LAW. 6 G.R. No. 233218 March 15, 2023 Upon arraignment, petitioner entered a plea of not guilty.7 Thereafter, trial on the merits ensued.
Mar 25, 2023 — [1] 310 Phil. 21 (1995) [Per J. Vitug, En Banc]. [2] 335 Phil. 664 (1997) [Per J. Panganiban, En Banc]. [3] Rollo, pp. 8-450. [4] Id. at 71-90. The February 25, 2010 Decision was penned by Associate Justice Vicente S. E. Veloso and was concurred in by Associate Justices Francisco P. Acosta and Rodil V. Zalameda (now a Justice of this Court) of the Special .
[ G.R. No. 210318, July 28, 2020 ] JANICE RESIDE Y TAN, PETITIONER, VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT. DECISION. REYES, J. JR., J.: The present Petition for Review on Certiorari1 filed under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court assails the June 28, 2013 Decision2 and the November 26, 2013 Resolution3 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CR No. 34634, .
[ G.R. No. 210318, July 28, 2020 ] JANICE RESIDE Y TAN, PETITIONER, VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT. DECISION. REYES, J. JR., J.: The present Petition for Review on Certiorari1 filed under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court assails the June 28, 2013 Decision2 and the November 26, 2013 Resolution3 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CR No. 34634, .[ G.R. No. 210318, July 28, 2020 ] JANICE RESIDE Y TAN, PETITIONER, VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT. DECISION. REYES, J. JR., J.: The present Petition for Review on Certiorari1 filed under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court assails the June 28, 2013 Decision2 and the November 26, 2013 Resolution3 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CR No. 34634, .
gr 210318|Case Digest: JANICE RESIDE Y TAN v. PEOPLE
PH0 · epublic of tbe flbilippine% ~upreme ~ourt
PH1 · The Book Shelf
PH2 · Philippine Jurisprudence
PH3 · G.R. No. 224316
PH4 · G.R. No. 210318 (Case Digest)
PH5 · G.R. No. 210318
PH6 · D E C I S I O N
PH7 · Case Digest: JANICE RESIDE Y TAN v. PEOPLE
PH8 · :J)lf[anila